Difference between pages "Stein, Grover, & Henningsen (1996)" and "Ball (1988)"

From MathEd.net Wiki
(Difference between pages)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Raymond Johnson
(title, notoc, outline, categories)
 
imported>Raymond Johnson
m (update categories)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
<span style="font-size: large">''Building Student Capacity for Mathematical Thinking and Reasoning: An Analysis of Mathematical Tasks Used in Reform Classrooms''</span>
The article ''Unlearning to Teach Mathematics'' was written by [[Deborah Ball]] and published in [[For the Learning of Mathematics]] in 1988. The article is available from JSTOR at [http://www.jstor.org/stable/40248141 http://www.jstor.org/stable/40248141]
__NOTOC__
The article ''Building Student Capacity for Mathematical Thinking and Reasoning: An Analysis of Mathematical Tasks Used in Reform Classrooms'' was written by [[Mary Kay Stein]], [[Barbara Grover]], and [[Marjorie Henningsen]] and published in the [[American Educational Research Journal]] in 1996. The article is available from Sage Publications at [http://aer.sagepub.com/content/33/2/455 http://aer.sagepub.com/content/33/2/455].


== Abstract ==
== Summary of ''Unlearning to Teach Mathematics'' ==


This article focuses on mathematical tasks as important vehicles for building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning. A stratified random sample of 144 mathematical tasks used during reform-oriented instruction was analyzed in terms of (a) task features (number of solution strategies, number and kind of representations, and communication requirements) and (b) cognitive demands (e.g., memorization, the use of procedures with [and without] connections to concepts, the "doing of mathematics"). The findings suggest that teachers were selecting and setting up the kinds of tasks that reformers argue should lead to the development of students' thinking capacities. During task implementation, the task features tended to remain consistent with how they were set up, but the cognitive demands of high-level tasks had a tendency to decline. The ways in which high-level tasks declined as well as factors associated with task changes from the set-up to implementation phase were explored.
Using a constructivist perspective, Ball recognized that teachers come to teacher education with ideas about teaching that influence their learning as preservice teachers. The many hours spent as students represents an ''apprenticeship of observation'' ([[Lortie (1975)|Lortie, 1975]]) that informs ideas about teaching and effective strategies for teaching mathematics. Despite being taught about learning and content in their coursework, Ball observed that this rarely seemed to influence what teachers actually do with students and hypothesized that the nature of coursework would need to confront teacher beliefs more directly. Ball describes apart of an introductory elementary teacher education course involving teaching permutations to her class of preservice teachers. The goal was not simply to teach her students about permutations, but also to learn more about their beliefs about the nature of mathematics and to develop strategies that might enlighten those beliefs and break the cycle of simply teaching how you were taught.


== Outline of Article Headings ==
By selecting permutations as the topic, Ball hoped to expose these introductory teachers to a topic they'd never studied formally. By carefully observing how her students constructed their knowledge, Ball would be able to see how their prior understandings about mathematics influenced their learning. The unit lasted two weeks. In the first phase of the unit, Ball tried to engage the students in the sheer size and scope of permutations, like by thinking about how the 25 students could be sat in 1,551,121,000,000,000,000,000,000 different seating arrangements. Working back to the simplest cases, with 2, 3, and 4, students, students could think and talk about the patterns that emerge and understand how the permutation grows so quickly. For homework, Ball asked students to address two goals: increase their understanding of permutations, but also think about the role homework plays in their learning, including how they approach and feel about it and why. In the second phase of the unit, Ball has her students observe her teaching young children about permutations, paying attention to the teacher-student interactions, the selection of tasks, and what the child appears to be thinking. In the last phase of the unit, the students become teachers and try helping someone else explore the concept of permutations. After discussing this experience, students wrote a paper reflecting on the entire unit.


* Conceptual Framework
From other research, Ball knew that teacher educators often assumed their students had mastery of content knowledge. Even moreso, future elementary math teachers themselves assumed they had mastery over the mathematical content they'd be expected to teach. She knew, however, that there was something extra a teacher needed to teach that content. Citing [[Shulman (1986)|Shulman's (1986)]] pedagogical content knowledge, along with numerous others, Ball describes some ways we can think about what that special content knowledge for teaching is, but admits that her permutations project was too narrow to explore how teachers construct and organzie that knowledge. The project would, however, give insight to her students' ideas about mathematics, and assumptions they make about what it means to know mathematics. For example, a student named Cindy wrote:
** Mathematical Tasks
 
** Task Set Up and Implementation
<blockquote>
* Methodology
I have always been a good math student so not understanding this concept was very frustrating to me. One thing I realized was that in high school we never learned the theories behind our arithmetic. We just used the formulas and carried out the problem solving. For instance, the way I learned permutations was just to use the factorial of the number and carry out the multiplication ... We never had to learn the concepts, we just did the problems with a formula. If you are only multiplying to get the answer every time, permutations could appear to be very easy. If you ask yourself why do we multiply and really try to understand the concept, then it may be very confusing as it was to me. (p. 44)
** Data Sources
</blockquote>
** Sampling Procedure
 
** Coding
Comments like this revealed that many of Ball's students relied on a procedural view of mathematics, one where the question "Why?" had been rarely asked. Ball also noticed a theme in her students' reflections about knowing math "for yourself" versus for teaching. Alison wrote:
** Analysis Procedures
 
* Results
<blockquote>
** Description of Mathematical Tasks
I was trying to teach my mother permutations. But it turned out to be a disaster. I understood permutations enough for myself, but when it came time to teach it, I realized that I didn't understand it as well as I thought I did. Mom asked me questions I couldn't answer. Like the question about there being four times and four positions and why it wouldn't be 4 x 4 = 16. She threw me with that one and I think we lost it for good there.
** Task Set Up
</blockquote>
** Task Implementation
 
** Factors Associated With How High-Level Tasks Were Implemented
From observing a young student learn about permutations in phase two, Ball noticed that some of her students started to challenge some of their assumptions they made about themselves as learners. Both from her experience and from the literature, Ball knew that elementary preservice teachers are often the most apprehensive about teaching mathematics. In some cases, these students choose to teach elementary in the hopes of avoiding any mathematical content they might find difficult. Changing these feelings about mathematics and about themselves is a difficult task for the teacher educator, but Ball did see progress. Christy, for example, said, "Most of all, I realized that I do have the ability to learn mathematics when it is taught in a thoughtful way" (p. 45). Unfortunately, not all shared this experience, as Mandy said she "did not enjoy the permutations activities because I was transported in time back to junior high school, where I remember mathematics as confusing and aggravating. Then as now, the explanations seemed to fly by me in a whirl of disassociated numbers and words" (p. 45).
* Discussion
 
** Instruction in Project Classrooms: Implications for Reform
In her conclusion, Ball says activities like the permutations project can be used by teacher educators to expose students' "knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes" (p. 46) about math and teaching math. By understanding the ideas prospective teachers bring with them, teacher educators can better develop preparation programs that address those beliefs in ways that strengthen the positive ones while changing some negative ones. Also, by including these kinds of activities with introductory preservice teachers, this can raise their expectations for what they will encounter later in methods classes. Summarizing, Ball concludes:
** Implications for Research
 
<blockquote>
How can teacher educators productively challenge, change, and extend what teacher education students bring? Knowing more about what teachers bring and what they learn from different components of and approaches to professional preparation is one more critical piece to the puzzle of improving the impact of mathematics teacher education on what goes on in elementary mathematics classrooms. (p. 46)
</blockquote>


== About ==
== About ==


=== Mendeley ===
=== See Also ===


[http://www.mendeley.com/catalog/building-student-capacity-mathematical-thinking-reasoning-analysis-mathematical-tasks-used-reform-cl/ http://www.mendeley.com/catalog/building-student-capacity-mathematical-thinking-reasoning-analysis-mathematical-tasks-used-reform-cl/]
* [http://blog.mathed.net/2012/09/rysk-balls-unlearning-to-teach.html Blog post] by [[Raymond Johnson]]


=== APA ===
=== APA ===


Stein, M. K., Grover, B. W., & Henningsen, M. A. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 455–488. doi:10.3102/00028312033002455
Ball, D. L. (1988). Unlearning to teach mathematics. ''For the Learning of Mathematics, 8(1)'', 40–48.


=== BibTeX ===
=== BibTeX ===


<pre>
<pre>
@article{Stein1996,
@article{Ball1988,
author = {Stein, Mary Kay and Grover, Barbara W. and Henningsen, Marjorie A.},
author = {Ball, Deborah Loewenberg},
doi = {10.3102/00028312033002455},
journal = {For the Learning of Mathematics},
journal = {American Educational Research Journal},
number = {1},
number = {2},
pages = {40--48},
pages = {455--488},
title = {{Unlearning to teach mathematics}},
title = {{Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms}},
url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/40248141},
url = {http://aer.sagepub.com/content/33/2/455.short},
volume = {8},
volume = {33},
year = {1988}
year = {1996}
}
}
</pre>
</pre>


[[Category:Summaries]]
[[Category:Journal Articles]]
[[Category:Journal Articles]]
[[Category:American Educational Research Journal]]
[[Category:For the Learning of Mathematics]]
[[Category:1996]]
[[Category:1988]]
[[Category:Curriculum Use]]
[[Category:Teacher Education]]
[[Category:Teacher Beliefs]]

Revision as of 05:14, 29 October 2013

The article Unlearning to Teach Mathematics was written by Deborah Ball and published in For the Learning of Mathematics in 1988. The article is available from JSTOR at http://www.jstor.org/stable/40248141

Summary of Unlearning to Teach Mathematics

Using a constructivist perspective, Ball recognized that teachers come to teacher education with ideas about teaching that influence their learning as preservice teachers. The many hours spent as students represents an apprenticeship of observation (Lortie, 1975) that informs ideas about teaching and effective strategies for teaching mathematics. Despite being taught about learning and content in their coursework, Ball observed that this rarely seemed to influence what teachers actually do with students and hypothesized that the nature of coursework would need to confront teacher beliefs more directly. Ball describes apart of an introductory elementary teacher education course involving teaching permutations to her class of preservice teachers. The goal was not simply to teach her students about permutations, but also to learn more about their beliefs about the nature of mathematics and to develop strategies that might enlighten those beliefs and break the cycle of simply teaching how you were taught.

By selecting permutations as the topic, Ball hoped to expose these introductory teachers to a topic they'd never studied formally. By carefully observing how her students constructed their knowledge, Ball would be able to see how their prior understandings about mathematics influenced their learning. The unit lasted two weeks. In the first phase of the unit, Ball tried to engage the students in the sheer size and scope of permutations, like by thinking about how the 25 students could be sat in 1,551,121,000,000,000,000,000,000 different seating arrangements. Working back to the simplest cases, with 2, 3, and 4, students, students could think and talk about the patterns that emerge and understand how the permutation grows so quickly. For homework, Ball asked students to address two goals: increase their understanding of permutations, but also think about the role homework plays in their learning, including how they approach and feel about it and why. In the second phase of the unit, Ball has her students observe her teaching young children about permutations, paying attention to the teacher-student interactions, the selection of tasks, and what the child appears to be thinking. In the last phase of the unit, the students become teachers and try helping someone else explore the concept of permutations. After discussing this experience, students wrote a paper reflecting on the entire unit.

From other research, Ball knew that teacher educators often assumed their students had mastery of content knowledge. Even moreso, future elementary math teachers themselves assumed they had mastery over the mathematical content they'd be expected to teach. She knew, however, that there was something extra a teacher needed to teach that content. Citing Shulman's (1986) pedagogical content knowledge, along with numerous others, Ball describes some ways we can think about what that special content knowledge for teaching is, but admits that her permutations project was too narrow to explore how teachers construct and organzie that knowledge. The project would, however, give insight to her students' ideas about mathematics, and assumptions they make about what it means to know mathematics. For example, a student named Cindy wrote:

I have always been a good math student so not understanding this concept was very frustrating to me. One thing I realized was that in high school we never learned the theories behind our arithmetic. We just used the formulas and carried out the problem solving. For instance, the way I learned permutations was just to use the factorial of the number and carry out the multiplication ... We never had to learn the concepts, we just did the problems with a formula. If you are only multiplying to get the answer every time, permutations could appear to be very easy. If you ask yourself why do we multiply and really try to understand the concept, then it may be very confusing as it was to me. (p. 44)

Comments like this revealed that many of Ball's students relied on a procedural view of mathematics, one where the question "Why?" had been rarely asked. Ball also noticed a theme in her students' reflections about knowing math "for yourself" versus for teaching. Alison wrote:

I was trying to teach my mother permutations. But it turned out to be a disaster. I understood permutations enough for myself, but when it came time to teach it, I realized that I didn't understand it as well as I thought I did. Mom asked me questions I couldn't answer. Like the question about there being four times and four positions and why it wouldn't be 4 x 4 = 16. She threw me with that one and I think we lost it for good there.

From observing a young student learn about permutations in phase two, Ball noticed that some of her students started to challenge some of their assumptions they made about themselves as learners. Both from her experience and from the literature, Ball knew that elementary preservice teachers are often the most apprehensive about teaching mathematics. In some cases, these students choose to teach elementary in the hopes of avoiding any mathematical content they might find difficult. Changing these feelings about mathematics and about themselves is a difficult task for the teacher educator, but Ball did see progress. Christy, for example, said, "Most of all, I realized that I do have the ability to learn mathematics when it is taught in a thoughtful way" (p. 45). Unfortunately, not all shared this experience, as Mandy said she "did not enjoy the permutations activities because I was transported in time back to junior high school, where I remember mathematics as confusing and aggravating. Then as now, the explanations seemed to fly by me in a whirl of disassociated numbers and words" (p. 45).

In her conclusion, Ball says activities like the permutations project can be used by teacher educators to expose students' "knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes" (p. 46) about math and teaching math. By understanding the ideas prospective teachers bring with them, teacher educators can better develop preparation programs that address those beliefs in ways that strengthen the positive ones while changing some negative ones. Also, by including these kinds of activities with introductory preservice teachers, this can raise their expectations for what they will encounter later in methods classes. Summarizing, Ball concludes:

How can teacher educators productively challenge, change, and extend what teacher education students bring? Knowing more about what teachers bring and what they learn from different components of and approaches to professional preparation is one more critical piece to the puzzle of improving the impact of mathematics teacher education on what goes on in elementary mathematics classrooms. (p. 46)

About

See Also

APA

Ball, D. L. (1988). Unlearning to teach mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 8(1), 40–48.

BibTeX

@article{Ball1988,
author = {Ball, Deborah Loewenberg},
journal = {For the Learning of Mathematics},
number = {1},
pages = {40--48},
title = {{Unlearning to teach mathematics}},
url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/40248141},
volume = {8},
year = {1988}
}