Difference between pages "Cognitively Guided Instruction" and "Sztajn, Confrey, Wilson, & Edgington (2012)"

From MathEd.net Wiki
(Difference between pages)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Raymond Johnson
(Created page with "*Carpenter Moser (1984) The acquisition of addition and subtraction concepts in grades one through three *[[Carpenter Fennema Peterson Chiang Loef (1989) Using knowledge o...")
 
imported>Raymond Johnson
(Created page with "{{Title|Learning Trajectory Based Instruction: Toward a Theory of Teaching}} __NOTOC__ * Authors: Paola Sztajn, Jere Confrey, P. Holt Wilson, and Cyn...")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
*[[Carpenter Moser (1984) The acquisition of addition and subtraction concepts in grades one through three]]
{{Title|Learning Trajectory Based Instruction: Toward a Theory of Teaching}}
*[[Carpenter Fennema Peterson Chiang Loef (1989) Using knowledge of childrens mathematics thinking in classroom teaching: An experimental study]]
__NOTOC__
*[[Knapp Peterson (1995) Teachers interpretations of CGI after four years: Meanings and practices]]
* Authors: [[Paola Sztajn]], [[Jere Confrey]], [[Holt Wilson|P. Holt Wilson]], and [[Cynthia Edgington]]
*[[Carpenter Fennema Franke (1996) Cognitively guided instruction: A knowledge base for reform in primary mathematics instruction]]
* Journal: [[Educational Researcher]]
*[[Fennema Carpenter Franke Levi Jacobs Empson (1996) A longitudinal study of learning to use childrens thinking in mathematics instruction]]
* Year: 2012
*[[Franke Carpenter Levi Fennema (2001) Capturing teachers generative change: A follow-up study of professional development in mathematics]]
* Source: http://edr.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.3102/0013189X12442801
 
==Abstract==
In this article, we propose a theoretical connection between research on learning and research on teaching through recent research on students' learning trajectories (LTs). We define learning trajectory based instruction (LTBI) as teaching that uses students' LTs as the basis for instructional decisions. We use mathematics as the context for our argument, first examining current research on LTs and then examining emerging research on how mathematics teachers use LTs to support their teaching. We consider how LTs provide specificity to four highly used frameworks for examining mathematics teaching, namely mathematical knowledge for teaching, task analysis, discourse facilitation practices, and formative assessment. We contend that by unifying various teaching frameworks around the science of LTs, LTBI begins to define a theory of teaching organized around and grounded in research on student learning. Thus, moving from the accumulation of various frameworks into a reorganization of the frameworks, LTBI provides an integrated explanatory framework for teaching.
 
==Corrolary==
;APA
: Sztajn, P., Confrey, J., Wilson, P. H., & Edgington, C. (2012). Learning trajectory based instruction: Toward a theory of teaching. ''Educational Researcher'', 41(5), 147–156. http://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12442801
;BibTeX
<pre>
@article{Sztajn2012,
author = {Sztajn, Paola and Confrey, Jere and Wilson, P. Holt and Edgington, Cynthia},
doi = {10.3102/0013189X12442801},
journal = {Educational Researcher},
number = {5},
pages = {147--156},
title = {{Learning trajectory based instruction: Toward a theory of teaching}},
url = {http://edr.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.3102/0013189X12442801},
volume = {41},
year = {2012}
}
</pre>
 
[[Category:Journal Articles]]
[[Category:Educational Researcher]]
[[Category:2012]]
[[Category:Learning Trajectories]]
[[Category:Teacher Knowledge]]
[[Category:Mathematical Tasks]]
[[Category:Classroom Discourse]]
[[Category:Formative Assessment]]

Latest revision as of 05:18, 23 May 2015

Learning Trajectory Based Instruction: Toward a Theory of Teaching

Abstract

In this article, we propose a theoretical connection between research on learning and research on teaching through recent research on students' learning trajectories (LTs). We define learning trajectory based instruction (LTBI) as teaching that uses students' LTs as the basis for instructional decisions. We use mathematics as the context for our argument, first examining current research on LTs and then examining emerging research on how mathematics teachers use LTs to support their teaching. We consider how LTs provide specificity to four highly used frameworks for examining mathematics teaching, namely mathematical knowledge for teaching, task analysis, discourse facilitation practices, and formative assessment. We contend that by unifying various teaching frameworks around the science of LTs, LTBI begins to define a theory of teaching organized around and grounded in research on student learning. Thus, moving from the accumulation of various frameworks into a reorganization of the frameworks, LTBI provides an integrated explanatory framework for teaching.

Corrolary

APA
Sztajn, P., Confrey, J., Wilson, P. H., & Edgington, C. (2012). Learning trajectory based instruction: Toward a theory of teaching. Educational Researcher, 41(5), 147–156. http://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12442801
BibTeX
@article{Sztajn2012,
author = {Sztajn, Paola and Confrey, Jere and Wilson, P. Holt and Edgington, Cynthia},
doi = {10.3102/0013189X12442801},
journal = {Educational Researcher},
number = {5},
pages = {147--156},
title = {{Learning trajectory based instruction: Toward a theory of teaching}},
url = {http://edr.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.3102/0013189X12442801},
volume = {41},
year = {2012}
}